Donovan v. RRL Corp. (2001)

Annotate this Case
[No. S082570. Sept. 12, 2001.]

BRIAN J. DONOVAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RRL CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

[Modification of opinion (26 Cal. 4th 261; 109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 807, 27 P.3d 702).]


The opinion herein, appearing in the Official Reports at 26 Cal. 4th 261, is modified as follows:

The sixth sentence of the first full paragraph on page 293 is modified by deleting the words "and did not seek in this action to recover damages for the incidental costs he incurred because of the erroneous advertisement."

As a result of this modification, the sixth sentence of the paragraph reads: "Plaintiff refused this offer to be restored to the status quo."

The modification does not affect the judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.