People v. Lawrence (2000)

Annotate this Case
[No. S070271. Oct. 3, 2000.]

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JIMMY DALE LAWRENCE, Defendant and Appellant.

[Modification of Opinion (24 Cal.4th 219) with no change in judgment.]

THE COURT.-

The opinion, which appears at 24 Cal. 4th 219, is modified in the following respect:

The sentence on page 233, which currently reads, "Durant suggests that the nature and elements of the current charged offenses--for example, the extent to which common acts and elements of such offenses unfold together or overlap, and the extent to which the elements of one offense have been satisfied, rendering that offense 'completed' in the eyes of the law before the commission of further criminal acts constituting additional and separately chargeable crimes--'are additional factors the court must consider in determining whether multiple current crimes were committed on the "same occasion" and arose from the "same set of operative facts" when the offenses are committed more than seconds apart' " is deleted and replaced with the following: "Durant suggests that the nature and elements of the current charged offenses--for example, the extent to which common acts and elements of such offenses unfold together or overlap, and the extent to which the elements of one offense have been satisfied, rendering that offense 'completed' in the eyes of the law before the commission of further criminal acts constituting additional and separately chargeable crimes--are additional factors the court must consider in determining whether multiple current crimes arose from the 'same set of operative facts' when the offenses are committed more than seconds apart."

This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.