Speik v. Sutphin

FREDERICK A. SPEIK, Appellant, v. I. O. SUTPHIN, Respondent.

COUNSEL

John W. Preston, Crump & Rogers and Wood, Crump & Rogers for Appellant.

Leland J. Allen for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

GIBSON, J.

[1] This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an [15 Cal. 2d 765] oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 PaCal.2d 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that case the judgment is affirmed.

Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C.J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.