Barsamyan v. Super. Ct., App. Div.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 10/1/08 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA VARDUI ROSE BARSAMYAN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) APPELLATE DIVISION OF ) THE SUPERIOR COURT ) OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ) ) Respondent; ) ) THE PEOPLE, ) ) Real Party in Interest. ) ___________________________________ ) S148712 Ct.App. 2/7 B188695 Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS099858 MODIFICATION OF OPINION THE COURT: The opinion filed August 7, 2008, and published at 44 Cal.4th 960, is modified in the following respect: On page 966, the first sentence of the first paragraph is modified to read as follows: As we shall explain, we agree with the trial court and the majority in the Court of Appeal that when appointed defense counsel appears for trial in two matters, and the calendar court selects or requires counsel to select a single matter for trial and sends that matter to a trial department for trial, counsel necessarily consents to continuance of the remaining matter. This modification does not affect the judgment. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.