- No case name available -

Annotate this Case
Opinions (People v. Smith fn. 1 ; Spear v. California State Auto. Assn. fn. 2 ;

Neary v. Regents of University of California fn. 3 ;

Harrold v. Rolling J Ranch fn. 4 ; Drexel v. Mann fn. 5 ;

Hacker v. City of Glendale fn. 6 ; Menendez v. Superior Court fn. 7 ;

Clark v. Burleigh fn. 8 ; Soroka v. Dayton Hudson Corp. fn. 9 ;

Feister v. Superior Court fn. 10 ; Johnson v. Bradley fn. 11 ;

California Auto. Assigned Risk Plan v. Gillespie fn. 12 ;

People v. Goodwin fn. 13 ; and Stonewall Ins. Co. v.

City of Palos Verdes Estates fn. 14 )

on pages 58-352 omitted.

FN 1. Review granted. Reprinted without change in 13 Cal. App. 4th 162, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 2. Review granted. See 2 Cal. 4th 1035 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 3. Review granted. See 3 Cal. 4th 273 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 4. Review granted. On November 30, 1992, cause transferred to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, with directions.

FN 5. Review granted. Reprinted without change in 13 Cal. App. 4th 170, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 6. Review granted. On November 30, 1992, cause transferred to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, with directions.

FN 7. Review granted. See 3 Cal. 4th 435 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 8. Review granted. See 4 Cal. 4th 474 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 9. Review granted. Reprinted without change in 13 Cal. App. 4th 192, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 10. Review granted. On October 29, 1992, review dismissed and cause remanded to Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two.

FN 11. Review granted. See 4 Cal. 4th 389 for Supreme Court opinion.

FN 12. Review granted. Reprinted without change in 13 Cal. App. 4th 212, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

FN 13. Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by order dated October 1, 1992.

FN 14. Review granted. Reprinted without change in 13 Cal. App. 4th 226, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.