Standard Pipe and Supply Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 10489. Second Appellate District, Division One. November 1, 1935.]

STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

COUNSEL

Raphael Dechter for Petitioner.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, D. De Coster, Deputy County Counsel, and Victor P. Showers for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Edmonds, J., pro tem.

[1] Petitioner in this matter is in exactly the same situation as the petitioner in Oil Well Supply Co. v. Superior Court (ante, p. 624 [51 PaCal.2d 908]), this day decided. As a creditor of Wigle & McBride and a beneficiary under the declaration of trust there referred to its rights to the trust property are also about to be determined by the superior court by an order to be made upon the report and account of the trustee.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the other proceeding it is ordered that the respondent superior court be and it is hereby prohibited from making or entering any judgment, order or decree in the Matter of Trusteeship of Wigle & McBride, Inc., a Corporation, No. 298-436 in said court.

Let a peremptory writ of prohibition issue accordingly.

York, Acting P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.