Pacific Indemnity Company v. Industrial Accident Commission

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 16398. Second Dist., Div. Two. July 13, 1948.]

PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY (a Corporation), Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and CELIA ANGULO, Respondents.

COUNSEL

Herlihy & Herlihy for Petitioner.

T. Groezinger for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

MOORE, P. J.

Celia Angulo was an employee of Rothschild-Kaufman Company on February 20, 1947, and was injured in the course of her employment. The facts are identical with those set forth in Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., et al., No. 16396, ante, p. 726 [195 P.2d 919], this day filed. The same authorities apply and the same conclusion has been reached. Basing the decision upon the opinion filed in that action the award is affirmed.

McComb, J., and Wilson, J., concurred.

Petitioner's application for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied September 8, 1948. Schauer, J., and Spence, J., voted for a hearing.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.