Bernhard v. Auschwitz

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 5211. Third Appellate District. June 20, 1935.]

PAUL BERNHARD, Respondent, v. ED AUSCHWITZ, Appellant.

COUNSEL

Hale McCowen and H. L. Preston for Appellant.

Sandford, Burger & Barry for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

The Court.

Ths is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Superior Court of Lake County, against the defendant in an action for damages to an automobile, brought by the assignee of the insurer of the car to whom the claim had come by subrogation.

[1] The car here in question was the sedan involved in the collision described in the case of Parker v. Auschwitz ante, p. 693 [47 PaCal.2d 341], and the right of the action to recover is based upon the law and the facts discussed in that case. It is unnecessary to again review the authorities cited.

For the reasons given in the case of Parker v. Auschwitz, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.