Gray v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 13976. Second Dist., Div. Two. Jan. 27, 1943.]

GILDA GRAY, Appellant, v. METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER CORPORATION (a Corporation et al., Respondents.

COUNSEL

White, McGee and Parker & Stanbury for Appellant.

Loeb & Loeb and Laurence M. Weinberg for Respondents. [56 Cal. App. 2d 941]

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

THE COURT.

Respondents having served and filed their motion to dismiss the appeals in the above entitled matter on the ground that appellants have failed to file a transcript as provided in the Rules of the Judicial Council for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, supported by a certificate of the Clerk of the Superior Court setting forth the facts as required by rule VI, and it appearing that all of the grounds stated in the motion are supported by the certificate and the authorities cited,

It is ordered that the appeals from the judgment and orders be, and the same hereby are, dismissed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.