People v. Thompson
Annotate this CaseTHE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. RILEY THOMPSON, Appellant.
COUNSEL
No appearance for Appellant.
Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and Alberta Belford, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
OPINION
The Court.
After having given notice of appeal in the superior court from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial, appellant presented to the trial judge his request for a transcript, but failed to set forth therein the grounds of his appeal. He filed no brief in this court, nor did he make any appearance herein.
[1] For the foregoing reasons, and pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial are, and each of them is, affirmed. [32 Cal. App. 2d 666]
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
