O'HARE v. PEACOCK DAIRIES, INC.

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 1842. Fourth Appellate District. May 14, 1938.]

JAMES M. O'HARE et al., Appellants, v. PEACOCK DAIRIES, INC. (a Corporation), Respondent.

COUNSEL

Joseph Scott and Claflin & Dorsey for Appellants.

Harvey, Johnston & Baker for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Marks, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from that portion of a judgment which fixed their damages for breach of contract at the sum of $10,158.24. The questions of the amount of damages awarded, the proper measure of damages and prospective damages are involved here.

[1] This appeal is from a judgment which is the same as that involved in the case of O'Hare et al. v. Peacock Dairies, Inc., bearing our Civil No. 1843 (ante, p. 345 [79 PaCal.2d 433]), the opinion in which cause has been filed this day. The two appeals are separate and have their own briefs and records. The questions presented on this appeal have all been considered and decided in that case and furnish our reasons and authorities for the decision of this appeal.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial solely upon the issue of the amount of damages, with [26 Cal. App. 2d 754] directions to the trial court to retry the issue of the amount of damages only; to amend its findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with the evidence so taken and the views expressed herein, and to render judgment in favor of plaintiffs for the amount of damages so found upon a determination of that issue.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.