McQueen v. Froding

Annotate this Case

[Civ. No. 10709. First Appellate District, Division One. May 5, 1938.]

L. J. McQUEEN, Respondent, v. CHARLES L. FRODING, Appellant.

COUNSEL

No appearance for Appellant.

Knight, Boland & Riordan for Respondent.

OPINION

The Court.

[1] Respondent having served and filed notice of motion to dismiss appeal herein, and no appearance having been made on behalf of appellant at the hearing of the motion and no opposition having been filed thereto, it is ordered that the motion be and the same is hereby granted upon the grounds stated therein, and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. [26 Cal. App. 2d 249]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.