Investors Thrift v. Plank

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 665. Fifth Dist. Oct. 18, 1967.]

INVESTORS THRIFT, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. IRVIN E. PLANK, Defendant and Appellant.

COUNSEL

Sidney G. Blacker for Defendant and Appellant.

Pettitt Blumberg & Sherr and James H. Flanagan, Jr., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

STONE, J.

This is a companion case to Investors Thrift v. AMA Corp., ante, page 205 [63 Cal. Rptr. 157]. Although the cases were tried separately, they have been presented jointly on appeal since the contentions in each case are the same.

The same contract is presented to the court for interpretation in each case, and the questions of law are identical.

Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated in Investors Thrift v. AMA Corp., supra, the order from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.

Conley, P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.