Churchill v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 2124. Fourth Appellate District. January 17, 1938.]

E. PERRY CHURCHILL, Respondent, v. TITLE INSURANCE AND TRUST COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant.

COUNSEL

P. Talbot Hannigan and Francis P. Harrington for Appellant.

Musick & Burrell, Clayton Straub and James E. Bednar for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Barnard, P. J.

The material facts involved in this appeal are exactly similar in all respects to those involved in Churchill v. Title Insurance & Trust Co., 4 Civil No. 2122, this day decided (ante, p. 415 [75 PaCal.2d 526]). [1] The same question of law is presented and for the reasons given in the case referred to and on the authority thereof the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Marks, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.