People v. Joseph

Annotate this Case
[Crim. No. 200. Fourth Appellate District. February 15, 1937.]

THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ARAM JOSEPH, Appellant.

COUNSEL

A. A. George for Appellant.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Warner I. Praul, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

OPINION

Barnard, P. J.

The respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the same has not been taken in accordance with law, in that no appeal lies from such an order.

[1] The order from which the purported appeal is taken is not an appealable order. (Pen. Code, sec. 1237; People v. Hinshaw, 194 Cal. 1 [227 P. 156]; People v. Simmons, 119 Cal. 1 [50 P. 844]; People v. Izlar, 8 Cal. App. 600 [97 P. 685]; People v. Williams, 8 Cal. App. 595 [97 P. 684].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.