Standard Radio & Television Co. v. Chronicle Publishing Co.

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 18221. First Dist., Div. Two. June 29, 1960.]

STANDARD RADIO AND TELEVISION COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent, v. THE CHRONICLE PUBLISHING COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants.

COUNSEL

Rea, Frasse, Anastasi, Clark & Chapman and Burnett, Burnett & Somers for Appellants.

Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Cooper, White & Cooper, Loeb & Loeb, Ruffo & Chadwick, Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Beresford & Webster, Beilenson, Meyer, Rosenfeld & Susman and Rankin, Oneal, Luckhardt, Center & Hall for Respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

STONE, J. pro tem.

This is a companion case to Standard Radio and Television Company v. The Chronicle Publishing Company, ante, p. 293 [6 Cal. Rptr. 246], 1 Civ. 18222. Defendants moved the court for a change of venue from Santa Clara County to the City and County of San Francisco. The motion was denied and defendants filed this appeal.

Since we have concluded in 1 Civ. 18222 that the state court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the litigation, this appeal is now moot. It is therefore dismissed.

Kaufman, P. J., and Draper, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.