Wyland v. Wyland

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 4529. Fourth Dist. Aug. 19, 1952.]

DOROTHY L. WYLAND, Respondent, v. CHARLES LEO WYLAND, Appellant.

COUNSEL

Rutan, Tucker, Howell & Tucker for Appellant.

James E. Walker for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of supersedeas to restrain the sale of certain real property, pursuant to an order of sale included in a judgment, pending the appeal from that judgment.

[1] The appellant having failed to comply with section 945 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and no sufficient reason having been shown why a stay was not perfected in accordance therewith, the petition must be denied. (Guardianship of Morro, 14 Cal. 2d 134 [92 P.2d 1012].)

The writ is denied and the order to show cause heretofore issued is discharged. [112 Cal. App. 2d 776]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.