North v. San Diego Trust and Savings Bank

Annotate this Case
[Civ. No. 1125. Fourth Appellate District. September 24, 1934.]

S. G. NORTH et al., Respondents, v. SAN DIEGO TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation) et al., Defendants; J. K. WILSON et al., Appellants.

COUNSEL

Frank J. Macomber for Appellants.

S. G. North, in pro. per., for Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum

Marks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting title to respondents' interests in two promissory notes which form the basis of the action in the case of C. C. North v. Lillian E. Evans, bearing our Civil number 1098 (ante, p. 64 [36 PaCal.2d 133]), the opinion in which is this day filed.

[1] The pertinent facts, except the assignment of an interest in the note to C. H. Lytle, all appear in the opinion in the case of North v. Evans. That opinion disposes of all the questions presented in the instant case and renders the questions here involved moot. For the reasons there given the judgment here appealed from is affirmed. The parties will pay their own costs of appeal.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.