People v. Tapia
Annotate this CaseThe Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea and to vacate his convictions on the ground that he was not informed of the actual adverse immigration consequences of his plea. The court upheld the trial court's finding that defendant was advised of the specific immigration consequences of his plea and the effect the plea would have on his legal resident status. Therefore, counsel's performance was not deficient. The court held that there was no erroneous advice given regarding immigration consequences and no ineffective assistance of counsel in defendant's case.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.