People v. Wright
Annotate this CaseDefendant challenges the trial court's finding that he is a sexually violent predator pursuant to Welf. & Inst. Code, 6600 et seq., and order of commitment to a state hospital for an indefinite term. The court agreed with defendant's argument that the diagnosis of hebephilia by the People‘s expert was fundamentally flawed due, inter alia, to a lack of information about the physical characteristics and/or sexual development of the victims. The expert explained, "Hebephilia is designated as a sexual arousal pattern, deviant pattern, that involves sexual interest in pubescent-age children. It would not be pre-pubescent, not post-pubescent. It‘s in that in-between area from pre-pubescent to post-pubescent." The court concluded that the judgment committing defendant to an indeterminate term as a SVP must be reversed for lack of substantial evidence. Accordingly, the court reversed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.