Moore v. City of Lemon Grove
Annotate this CaseSanitation fee ratepayer Jack Moore sought to stop respondents City of Lemon Grove and the Lemon Grove Sanitation District from transferring funds collected as sewer service fees and charges to the City's general fund, claiming that the transfers violated Proposition 218 (the Right to Vote on Taxes Act). The trial court concluded that the charges at issue were subject to Proposition 218, but that they did not violate the Proposition as the District had used reasonable methods to determine the amounts to transfer. Moore appealed, arguing his petition for a writ of mandate and equitable relief was denied in error. But finding no error, the Court of Appeal affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.