In re Briana V.
Annotate this CaseLuis V. (father) appealed a juvenile court order establishing jurisdiction over his three daughters: Briana V., Marlene V., and Patricia V., pursuant to Welfare & Institutions Code section 300. Father was the primary caregiver for the children, who lived with him and paternal grandmother (PGM). Father and the girls' mother, Chantha T. had been separated for approximately two years. Mother was in a new relationship with P.K. and they had a child together, Vincent K. In late 2013, the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) received a referral alleging that Briana had been physically abused by father and PGM. DCFS detained Briana, Marlene, and Patricia from father, and shortly thereafter, filed a section 300 petition on behalf of Briana, Marlene, Patricia, and Vincent. The petition alleged under subdivision a-1 that father had physically abused Briana when he slapped her on the face. Under subdivision (b) (failure to protect), counts 1 to 4, the petition alleged that father was a registered sex offender and had exposed his penis to Patricia and bathed and dressed the girls; that father physically abused Briana by slapping her face; and that father failed to protect the girls by allowing paternal uncle Octavio, who was a current user of marijuana, to stay in the home. Under subdivision (d) (sexual abuse), the petition repeated the allegations that father was a registered sex offender, had bathed and dressed the children, and shared a bedroom with them. Father contended in his appeal of the juvenile court order that substantial evidence did not support the juvenile court's findings as to him. Finding no reversible error, the Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.