Eneaji v. Ubboe
Annotate this CasePlaintiff challenged an order denying her request to renew a domestic violence restraining order against her former spouse. On rehearing, the court reinstated the original opinion reversing the order denying the request for a renewal of the domestic violence order. The court concluded that the trial court erred in concluding that the denial was appropriate because nothing happened in the three years since the restraining order. Further, the trial court incorrectly concluded that Ritchie v. Konrad required a reasonable apprehension of future physical abuse. Under the circumstances, the order denying the renewal request must be reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.