Misik v. D'Arco

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 8/9/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THOMAS MISIK, Plaintiff and Appellant, B224203 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GC041193) v. THOMAS R. D ARCO, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Defendant and Respondent. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 27, 2011, be modified as follows: On page 2, the second and third sentences of the first full paragraph are deleted and the following sentences are inserted in their place: The judgment had found Sayrahan Group, LLC (Sayrahan) liable for breach of contract. The motion to amend the judgment relied on the alter ego doctrine to argue that the trial court should find that D Arco was the alter ego of Sayrahan and should hold D Arco liable for the judgment. There is no change in the judgment.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.