P. v. Buza

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 8/31/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A125542 (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. SCN 207818) MARK BUZA, Defendant and Appellant. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] THE COURT: It is ordered that the published opinion filed herein on August 4, 2011, be modified as follows: 1. At the end of the paragraph beginning near the middle of page 43 and ending near the middle of page 44, the following sentence should be added: If it did, the State could take a DNA sample from every citizen and use it for investigative purposes, an Orwellian prospect. There is no change in the judgment. Dated: ____________________ ______________________________ Kline, P.J. Trial Court: Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco Trial Judge: Hon. Carol Yaggy Attorneys for Appellant: First District Appellate Project Matthew Zwerling, Executive Director J. Bradley O Connell, Asst. Director Kathryn Seligman, Staff Attorney Attorneys for Respondent: Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General Dane R. Gillette, Chief Asst. Atty. General Gerald A. Engler, Sr. Asst. Atty. General Joyce Blair, Supervising Deputy A.G. Stan Helfman, Supervising Deputy A.G. Enid A. Camps, Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Amicus Curiae DNA Saves, in support of Respondent: Fulbright & Jaworski Tillman James Breckenridge Jonathan S. Franklin

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.