Figueroa v. Cal. Energy Resources

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 8/25/03; reposted to correct filing date; no change to mod. text CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ALFREDO A. FIGUEROA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, E030510 v. (Super.Ct.No. BLC1812) CALIFORNIA ENERGY RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION , Defendant and Respondent; MODIFICATION OF OPINION AND DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] BLYTHE ENERGY, LLC, Defendant and Real Party in Interest. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed July 25, 2003, is modified in the following respects: 1. Page 2, second paragraph under Facts and Procedural History, correct spelling of Warren-Aliquots to Warren-Alquist in both references. 2. Page 5, delete the entire paragraph beginning But the regulation requires . . . period has elapsed . 3. Page 5, to the paragraph following the deleted paragraph, beginning Regulation . . . add the word However, regulation and continue as written. This modification does not effect a change in the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied. /s/ Ward J. We concur: /s/ Ramirez P.J. /s/ Hollenhorst J.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.