So. Cal. Edison v. PUC
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 9/10/02 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, B151560 (C.P.U.C. Dec. No. 01-01-007) Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent; CAITHNESS ENERGY, Real Party in Interest. ___________________________________ CAITHNESS ENERGY, B152003 Petitioner, (C.P.U.C. Dec. No. 01-06-043) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, Real Party in Interest. THE COURT*: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 20, 2002, and certified for publication, be modified as follows: On page 1, caption should read as follows: CAITNESS should be CAITHNESS ; Title page, the word Company should be added after Southern California Edison ; On page 2, line 8: Squieri should read Squeri ; On page 2, line 17: adjusted the prices should read adjusted a component of the prices ; On page 2, line 25: floor on losses should read floor on transmission loss factors ; On page 3, line 4: Utilities should read Utility ; On page 3, line 5: 3119 should read 3117 ; On page 4, line 12, the word resistance should be followed by the word of instead of to ; On page 4, line 18, .95 should read 0.95 ; On page 4, line 24: avoided line cost-based energy prices should read avoided cost-based energy prices ; On page 5, line 2: avoided loss energy payments should read avoided cost energy payments ; On page 5, line 12: In 1985 should read In 1987 ; On page 5, line 12: In 1985 should be In 1987 * PERLUSS, Acting P.J. MUNOZ, J. (Assigned) 2 On page 5, line 16: line studies should read line loss studies ; On page 6, line 14: increases and should be deleted; On page 6, line 24: Energy Commission should read Energy Division ; On page 7, line 8: caused by the generator should read caused by the generation ; On page 7, line 11: expost should read ex post ; On page 8, line 8: marker should read market ; On page 8, line 10: elimination of the PX should read elimination of the requirement that the three investor-owned utilities must sell into and buy from the PX ; On page 8, line 25: and the other should be deleted; On page 9, line 8: the word that should be replaced with the word for ; On page 9, line 18: Advocate should read Advocates ; On page 10, line 22: the power GMMs should read the GMMs ; On page 10, line 23: throughout out the system should read throughout the system ; On page 11, line 21: GMMS should read GMMs ; On page 12, line 14: speculated should read calculated ; On page 13, line 18: commission should read Commission ; On page 14, line 15: .95 should read 0.95 ; On page 15, line 15: QFS should read QFs ; On page 15, line 23: In ordering the disbanding of the PX should read In ordering the elimination of the requirement to sell into and buy from the PX ; 3 On page 16, line 24: floor on rates should read floor on transmission loss factors ; On page 17, line 14: taxpayers should read ratepayers ; 4
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
