Green v. Kelley (Majority)

Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant's appeal from the circuit court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, holding that because Appellant was no longer incarcerated, the circuit court could not grant him the relief he requested.

In his habeas petition, Petitioner challenged two judgments entered in 2008 and 2011. When he filed his habeas petition Petitioner was incarcerated in an Arkansas Department of Correction facility. By the time this case reached the Supreme Court Appellant was no longer incarcerated by the Arkansas Department of Correction. The Supreme Court dismissed Appellant's appeal from the denial of his petition, holding that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to grant the requested relief.

Download PDF
Cite as 2019 Ark. 317 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-19-269 Opinion Delivered: November JAMES GREEN APPELLANT V. 7, 2019 PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE HOT SPRING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 30CV-18-112] WENDY KELLEY, DIRECTOR, HONORABLE EDDY R. EASLEY, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF JUDGE CORRECTION APPELLEE DISMISSED. RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice James Green appeals the Hot Spring County Circuit Court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Green challenged two judgments entered in 2008 and 2011 in the Drew County Circuit Court. Because Green is no longer incarcerated, the circuit court cannot grant him the relief he requests. See Curtis v. Hobbs, 2015 Ark. 127 (per curiam). We accordingly dismiss. The first judgment reflects Green’s guilty pleas to first-degree terroristic threatening, second-degree sexual assault, and the violation of terms of a suspended imposition of sentence on an additional count of first-degree terroristic threatening. The second judgment followed a jury trial at which Green was found guilty of failing to register as a sex offender and living near a school or daycare as a registered sex offender. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed that judgment. Green v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 63 (unpublished). When he filed his habeas petition Green was incarcerated in an Arkansas Department of Correction facility located in Malvern in Hot Springs County. However, he recently provided this court’s clerk a new mailing address in Drew County, and public records confirm that he is no longer incarcerated by the Arkansas Department of Correction. The purpose of a writ of habeas corpus is to remedy a detention of an illegal period of time. Conley v. Kelley, 2019 Ark. 23, 566 S.W.3d 116. When the petitioner is not serving a sentence for the charges challenged, the writ is not available for those convictions. Id. A circuit court no longer has jurisdiction to issue and make returnable before itself a writ of habeas corpus if the petitioner is no longer incarcerated within its jurisdiction. Noble v. State, 2018 Ark. 2, 534 S.W.3d 717; Tyson v. State, 2014 Ark. 421, 444 S.W.3d 361. Dismissed. James Green, pro se appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: David L. Eanes Jr., Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.