Story v. State (Majority)
Annotate this CaseThe Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court’s denial of Appellant’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, in which Appellant argued that he was entitled to issuance of the writ because the judgment in his criminal case was illegal, that the sentencing order reflected only one of his convictions, that that authorities illegally seized his property, and that his arrest was illegal. The Supreme Court held that the circuit court properly denied Appellant’s habeas petition because the grounds raised by Appellant did not constitute a basis for a writ of habeas corpus.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.