Davis v. Kelley (Per Curiam)Annotate this Case
After a jury trial, Appellant was found guilty of capital murder, aggravated robbery, and theft of property. In a separate trial, Appellant was found guilty by a jury of an additional aggravated robbery. Appellant later filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he was not properly advised of his Miranda rights when he was interrogated by the police. The circuit court denied the writ. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Appellant did not state a ground on which a writ of habeas corpus should be issued and that the circuit court was not clearly erroneous in denying habeas relief without a hearing.