Pokatilov v. State (Majority)

Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed Appellant’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with purpose to deliver, for which Appellant was sentenced to five years’ probation and ordered to pay a $5000 fine. The court held (1) the trial court did not err by denying Appellant’s motions for directed verdict; (2) the trial court did not err by failing to give Appellant’s proffered jury instruction regarding constructive possession; and (3) the trial court did not commit clear error in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of a search.

Download PDF
Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Cite as 2017 Ark. 264 Jeff Rosenzweig, for appellant. Leslie Rutledge, Att'y Gen., by: Amanda Jegley, for appellee.