Evans v. State (Per Curiam)Annotate this Case
After a jury trial, Petitioner was found guilty of aggravated robbery, theft of property, and being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court of appeals affirmed. Petitioner later filed a pro se petition seeking reinvestment of jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis in the case, claiming that the State violated Brady v. Maryland during the trial proceedings. The Surpeme Court denied the petition, holding that Petitioner failed to establish a Brady violation and failed to state a ground within any of the other categories under which a writ of error coram nobis is proper.