Hutcherson v. State (Per Curiam)Annotate this Case
After a jury trial, Appellant was found guilty of four counts of aggravated robbery, three counts of misdemeanor theft of property, and one count of felony theft of property. The court of appeals affirmed. Appellant later filed in the Supreme Court two petitions to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. The Supreme Court denied the petitions because they either did not state a ground for the writ or were without merit. Appellant subsequently filed a third coram-nobis petition. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, holding that his successive application for coram-nobis relief was an abuse of the writ because he alleged no fact sufficient to distinguish his claims in the instant petition from the claims in the first or second.