Childers v. State (Per Curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2015 Ark. 451 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-15-880 ANNA CHRISTINE CHILDERS APPELLANT Opinion Delivered December 3, 2015 AMENDED MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE MOTION GRANTED. PER CURIAM Appellant Anna Christine Childers, by and through her attorney, has filed an amended motion for rule on clerk. Her attorney, Philip C. Wilson, states in the motion that the record has not been timely lodged due to a mistake on his part. This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated appeals in McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we said that there are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or, there is “good reason.” 356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained as follows: Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present. Cite as 2015 Ark. 451 Id. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault when he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. See id. In accordance with McDonald, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883, Mr. Wilson has candidly admitted fault. The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. Motion granted. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.