Lukach v. Hobbs (Per Curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2014 Ark. 106 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-13-571 Opinion Delivered March JOHN RICHARD LUKACH 6, 2014 APPELLANT V. RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION APPELLEE PRO SE MOTION FOR EXPANSION OF PAGE LIMIT FOR BRIEF AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF; MOTION FOR HEARING AND FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; MOTION TO ATTACH DIRECT-APPEAL BRIEFS AS EXHIBITS; AMENDED MOTION FOR EXPANSION OF PAGE LIMIT FOR BRIEF [JEFFERSON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 35CV-13-12] HONORABLE JODI RAINES DENNIS, JUDGE APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS MOOT. PER CURIAM On January 8, 2013, appellant John Richard Lukach filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Jefferson County Circuit Court where he was incarcerated. The circuit court dismissed the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court. Now before us are appellant s motions for expansion of page limit for brief and extension of time to file brief, for hearing and appointment of counsel, and to attach direct-appeal briefs as exhibits, as well as his amended motion for expansion of page limit. We do not reach the merits of the motions and dismiss the appeal because the Jefferson County Circuit Court can no longer grant the relief requested by appellant. See Chestang v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 404 (per curiam). An appeal of the denial of postconviction relief, including an appeal Cite as 2014 Ark. 106 from an order that denied a petition for writ of habeas corpus, will not be permitted to go forward where it is clear that the appeal is without merit. Glaze v. State, 2013 Ark. 458 (per curiam); Wilencewicz v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 230 (per curiam). Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody, unless the petition is filed pursuant to Act 1780 of 2001. Wilencewicz, 2012 Ark. 230; Davis v. Hobbs, 2012 Ark. 167 (per curiam). Appellant s petition was not filed under Act 1780, and the public records of the Arkansas Department of Correction confirm that appellant is now incarcerated in a facility in Lincoln County. A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody in that court s jurisdiction. Fields v. State, 2013 Ark. 471 (per curiam); Chestang, 2011 Ark. 404. When a prisoner who seeks habeas relief is transferred to a facility in a different county, the circuit court in the county where the prisoner was previously incarcerated no longer has jurisdiction to issue and make a returnable writ. Fields, 2013 Ark. 471; Wilencewicz, 2012 Ark. 230. Although the Jefferson County Circuit Court may have retained subject-matter jurisdiction, it does not retain personal jurisdiction over the person in whose custody the prisoner is detained, and an order by that court will not act to effect his release. Davis v. Hobbs, 2013 Ark. 378 (per curiam). This court will dismiss an appeal of the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus when the appellant is no longer incarcerated in the county where his petition was filed because the court can no longer grant the relief sought. Id. Appeal dismissed; motions moot. John Richard Lukach, pro se appellant. No response. 2 Cite as 2014 Ark. 106 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
