Jackson v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAppellant, by and through his attorney John R. Irwin, filed a motion for rule on clerk and a motion to be relieved as counsel. In his motion for rule on clerk Irwin claimed that the clerk refused to file the untimely record because of Irwin’s failure to follow the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure-Criminal. The Supreme Court (1) granted the motion for rule on clerk, as Irwin candidly admitted fault in accordance with McDonald v. State; and (2) granted the motion to be relieved as counsel because Irwin - a full-time, state-salaried public defender - was not eligible for compensation on appeal.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.