Smith v. State (Per Curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2013 Ark. 178 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR13-20 PATRICK CINQUE SMITH APPELLANT Opinion Delivered April 25, 2013 V. APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-10-3534] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE LEON JOHNSON, JUDGE APPELLEE MOTION DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD ORDERED. PER CURIAM Appellant Patrick Cinque Smith has appealed his convictions of aggravated robbery and theft of property for which he received an aggregate sentence of life in prison. Before the court is his motion to supplement the record on appeal to correct omissions contained in the transcript. One such omission is found on page 333 of the transcript. However, the supplemental record that appellant has provided does not correct the identified omission on that page. Specifically, the supplemental record does not include the response of Mr. Hancock on line ten. We deny without prejudice the motion to supplement and direct further supplementation of the record to correct the aforementioned deficiency. Appellant, pro se. No response.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.