Hill v. State (Per Curiam)
Annotate this CaseAppellant lodged in the Supreme Court an appeal from three orders that denied a number of pleadings that Appellant had filed in the trial court where he was convicted of capital murder in 1995. Appellant filed his brief in the appeal, and, after that, filed a motion to introduce newly discovered evidence. The State filed its brief, and Appellant tendered a reply brief along with a motion to extend the page limit. Later, Appellant filed three more motions. The Supreme Court (1) granted the motion to extend the page limit on the reply brief; (2) denied the motions to introduce newly discovered evidence and compel; and (3) affirmed the trial court's denial of relief in the three orders.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.