Skinner v. Hobbs
Annotate this CaseAppellant Mitchell Skinner entered into a negotiated plea of guilty to capital murder and was sentenced to life without parole. Appellant subsequently filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, arguing (1) the trial court failed to comply with the rules of criminal procedure during the guilty-plea proceeding, (2) his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered into, and (3) his counsel rendered ineffective assistance. The circuit court dismissed the petition, ruling (1) Appellant failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted, and (2) because Appellant had previously made his claims on direct appeal and in a petition for postconviction relief, the doctrine of law-of-the-case precluded reconsideration of the issues. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the circuit court properly dismissed Appellant's petition because Appellant failed to state a cognizable claim, and therefore, he failed to show any basis for a finding that a habeas writ should issue.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.