Edward Loveless v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Mike Beebe, Governor, and Roy Agee, Arkansas Department of Correction Keeper of Records
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
No.
08-533
Opinion Delivered
EDWARD LOVELESS
Appellant
v.
LARRY NORRIS, DIRECTOR,
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTION, MIKE BEEBE,
GOVERNOR, AND ROY AGEE,
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTION KEEPER OF
RECORDS
Appellees
April 9, 2009
PRO SE MOTION FOR
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
[CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON
COUNTY, CV 2008-27, HON.
ROBERT H. WYATT, JR., JUDGE]
MOTION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Appellant Edward Loveless filed a pro se pleading styled as a petition for declaratory
judgment and writ of mandamus in circuit court. The court dismissed the petition and appellant
lodged an appeal of the order in this court. We denied a petition for writ of certiorari and dismissed
the appeal. Loveless v. Norris, 08-533 (Ark. Sept. 25, 2008) (per curiam). Appellant moved for
reconsideration of the decision and we denied the motion. Loveless v. Norris, 08-533 (Ark. Nov.
20, 2008) (per curiam). Appellant has now filed a “request for a certificate of appealability” in this
court.
In his motion, appellant does not clearly identify the relief he seeks. He appears to desire this
court to provide some order to facilitate a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme
Court. He does not, however, provide a basis for the request and we are not aware of any rule or
provision to support such a request. Because appellant does not provide any basis upon which relief
can be granted, we deny the motion.
Motion denied.
Gunter, J., not participating.
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
