Dale Hayden v. State of Arkansas

Annotate this Case
cr98-625

ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

June 24, 2004

DALE HAYDEN

Petitioner

v.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

Respondent

CR 98-625

PRO SE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION FOR BELATED APPEAL [CIRCUIT COURT OF NEVADA COUNTY, NO. CR 89-1-3, HON. PHILIP PURIFOY, JUDGE]

MOTION DENIED

                                                                                                            Per Curiam

On May 8, 1998, Dale Hayden, who was represented by retained counsel, filed a motion for belated appeal in this court seeking to be permitted to proceed with the belated appeal of two postconviction orders entered in the Circuit Court of Nevada County in 1997. We denied the motion. Hayden v. State, CR 98-625 (Ark. June 4, 1998) (per curiam order).

On June 8, 2004, six years after the motion was denied, petitioner filed the instant pro se motion asking that the decision be reconsidered. As petitioner did not act with due diligence in seeking reconsideration, the motion is denied.

Motion denied.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.