Brown v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Cite as 2012 Ark. App. 593 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CACR12-247 Opinion Delivered October MARQUITA BROWN APPELLANT V. 24, 2012 APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST DIVISION [NO. CR2010-1453] STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE JAMES LEON JOHNSON, JUDGE APPELLEE AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge After a bench trial, Marquita Brown was convicted in Pulaski County Circuit Court of second-degree battery and misdemeanor first-degree criminal mischief. She received concurrent sentences of 120 days in the county jail followed by five years probation on the second-degree battery conviction and one year probation on the criminal mischief conviction. The judgment and disposition order entered by the court, however, erroneously indicated that Brown had been convicted of felony first-degree criminal mischief. On appeal, Brown argues that, because there was insufficient evidence to support a felony criminal-mischief conviction, her conviction should be reversed. We find that there was a clerical error in the judgment and disposition order, reject her argument that her conviction should be reversed, and affirm as modified. We have reviewed the record, and it is apparent from our review that the judgment Cite as 2012 Ark. App. 593 and disposition order entered in this case simply reflects a scrivener s error that must be corrected. At the close of the State s case, the circuit court granted Brown s motion for a directed verdict on the felony criminal-mischief charge because it found that there was insufficient proof of the dollar amount required to convict Brown of a felony.1 The court, however, allowed the State to amend the information to a misdemeanor charge to conform to the proof. The court subsequently found Brown guilty on both remaining counts the second-degree battery charge and the misdemeanor criminal-mischief charge. Because Brown was not actually convicted of felony criminal mischief, her substantial-evidence arguments in that regard are misplaced. Rather, the notation on the judgment and disposition order that Brown had been found guilty of felony criminal mischief was simply a clerical error, and clerical errors do not prevent the enforcement of a judgment and commitment order. Carter v. Norris, 367 Ark. 360, 240 S.W.3d 124 (2006); Johnson v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 606, ___ S.W.3d ___. Accordingly, we correct the judgment and disposition order to reflect that Brown was convicted of misdemeanor first-degree criminal mischief, not felony first-degree criminal mischief. With this modification, we affirm. Affirmed as modified. PITTMAN and MARTIN, JJ., agree. John William Crow, for appellant. Dustin McDaniel, Att y Gen., by: Pamela A. Rumpz, Ass t Att y Gen., for appellee. 1 The amount necessary to be convicted of felony first-degree criminal mischief was $500 or more. See Ark. Code Ann. ยง 5-38-203(b)(1) (Repl. 2006). The State conceded that it had not proved damages of over $500, and the court determined that the testimony reflected damages of only $116.82 an amount insufficient for a felony conviction, but sufficient for a conviction on a misdemeanor count. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
