Kasey J. Doss v. State of Arkansas

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
DIVISION I ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, CHIEF JUDGE CACR05-516 June 28, 2006 APPEAL FROM THE UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CR-2003-0514-1] KASEY J. DOSS APPELLANT V. HON. HAMILTON H. SINGLETON, JUDGE AFFIRMED STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE In December 2003, the appellant in this criminal case was convicted of second-degree forgery, residential burglary, and theft of property and was placed on probation for five years. Subsequently the State filed a petition to revoke alleging numerous violations of the conditions of appellant’s probation. After a hearing on October 6, 2004, the trial court found that appellant violated the conditions of her probation and sentenced her to four years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. This appeal followed. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(j) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, appellant's attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel on the ground that the appeal is wholly without merit. The motion is accompanied by an abstract, brief, and addendum referring to everything in the record that might arguably support the appeal, including all motions, objections, and requests decided adversely to appellant and a statement of reasons why none of those rulings would be a meritorious ground for appeal. The clerk of this court furnished appellant with a copy of her counsel's brief and notified her of her right to file a pro se statement of points for reversal within thirty days. Appellant did not file such a statement. From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with Rule 4-3(j) and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted, and the order of revocation is affirmed. Affirmed. H ART and G RIFFEN, JJ., agree. -2- CACR05-516

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.