NINA E., A.S. v. DCS, et al.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE NINA E., A.S., Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SAFETY, ERIC S., JOCELYN S., Appellees. No. 1 CA-JV 17-0168 FILED 8-24-2017 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. JD 528623 The Honorable Arthur T. Anderson, Judge APPEAL DISMISSED COUNSEL Maricopa County Public Advocate, Mesa By Suzanne W. Sanchez Counsel for Appellant Nina E. Arizona Attorney General's Office, Mesa By Ashlee N. Hoffmann Counsel for Appellee DCS Artemis Law Firm, PLLC, Scottsdale By Victoria E. Ames Counsel for Appellee Intervenor Jocelyn S. NINA E., A.S. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Jon W. Thompson and Judge Jennifer B. Campbell joined. B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 Nina E. (“Mother”) appeals from the juvenile court’s order changing A.S.’s placement. On July 10, 2017, the juvenile court held a contested severance hearing at which Mother knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily chose to waive her rights to contest the termination of her parental rights. This renders Mother’s appeal moot. ¶2 As a policy of judicial restraint, this court generally will not address moot or abstract questions. Lana A. v. Woodburn, 211 Ariz. 62, 65, ¶ 9 (App. 2005). “A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where, as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marton & Assoc., 159 Ariz. 1, 4 (App. 1988). The juvenile court terminated appellant Nina E.’s parental rights to A.S. on July 10, 2017. As a result, a decision on the merits of Mother’s appeal from the order changing A.S.’s placement would have no effect on the parties because Mother no longer has any parental rights with respect to A.S. ¶3 Accordingly, it is ordered dismissing this appeal.1 AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court FILED: AA A.S., through her guardian ad litem, also appealed the placement order but did not file an appellate brief or join in Mother’s briefing. Thus, pursuant to Arizona Rule of Juvenile Court Procedure 106(E), we dismiss the appeal filed by A.S. 1 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
