Snider v. Snider
Annotate this CaseA father filed for divorce and sought sole physical custody of the couple’s only child. Shortly before trial the father moved for a continuance. The court vacated the first scheduled trial day, used the second to take testimony from out-of-state witnesses, then continued taking evidence a few days later. In the middle of that day’s proceedings the court informed the parties it was their last opportunity to present evidence. The father objected, and in post-trial pleadings he presented the affidavit testimony of two other witnesses he had intended to call. The superior court denied his requests to present additional evidence. Because the lack of clarity in the proceedings led the father to reasonably believe he would have another opportunity to call witnesses, the Supreme Court held that the superior court abused its discretion when it failed to give him that opportunity. The case was remanded back to the superior court for a limited presentation of additional testimony. The Supreme Court rejected the father’s arguments that the superior court erred by denying a motion for recusal and in its weighing of the best interest factors relevant to the award of physical custody.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.