Ex parte Ronald Kidd and Teodosio Arroyo Martinez. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Ex parte F.A. "Bubba" Bingham, in his official capacity as director, Department of Public Safety; et al. (In re: Ronald Kidd and Teodosio Arroyo Martinez et al. v. F.A. "Bubba" Bingham, in his official capacity as director, Department of Public Safety; et al.))

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 05/24/2013 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ( ( 3 3 4 ) 2 2 9 ¬ 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2012-2013 1110767 Ex p a r t e Ronald Kidd and Teodosio Arroyo Martinez PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In r e : Ex p a r t e F.A. "Bubba" Bingham, i n h i s o f f i c i a l c a p a c i t y as d i r e c t o r , Department o f P u b l i c S a f e t y ; e t a l . (In r e : Ronald Kidd and Teodosio Arroyo Martinez e t a l . v. F.A. "Bubba" Bingham, i n h i s o f f i c i a l c a p a c i t y as d i r e c t o r , Department o f P u b l i c S a f e t y ; e t a l . ) ) (Montgomery C i r c u i t Court, CV-10-1017; Court o f C i v i l Appeals, 2100676) 1110767 MURDOCK, The Justice. p e t i t i o n f o r the w r i t of c e r t i o r a r i i s denied. In d e n y i n g t h e p e t i t i o n f o r t h e w r i t o f c e r t i o r a r i , t h i s Court does language, not wish as a p p r o v i n g a l l the reasons, or statements of law i n the Court of C i v i l Appeals' opinion. 2d 155 t o be u n d e r s t o o d H o r s l e y v . H o r s l e y , 291 A l a . 782, 280 So. (1973). WRIT DENIED. S t u a r t , B o l i n , P a r k e r , Shaw, M a i n , a n d W i s e , J J . , c o n c u r . Moore, C . J . , d i s s e n t s . Bryan, J . , recuses h i m s e l f . * * J u s t i c e B r y a n was a member o f t h e C o u r t o f C i v i l when t h a t c o u r t c o n s i d e r e d t h i s c a s e . 2 Appeals

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.