Supreme Court of Alabama Decisions 1991

Search or browse the full text of Supreme Court of Alabama decisions from 1991. Subscribe to Justia's free newsletter with summaries of the latest decisions from the Supreme Court of Alabama, browse our free archive of Supreme Court of Alabama cases by year, or search by case name, docket number, citation, or text phrase.

Opinions 501 - 517 of 517

Ex Parte Yelder
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 137
Ex Parte Coker
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 43
Alabama Power Co. v. Turner
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 551
Liggans RV Center v. JOHN DEERE INS.
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 567
Harris v. M & S TOYOTA, INC.
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 74
Cummans v. Dobbins
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 81
Lanier v. Moore-Handley, Inc.
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 83
Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 575 So. 2d 91
Ex Parte Johnson
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 576 So. 2d 1281
Farley v. CNA Ins. Co.
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 576 So. 2d 158
Lambert v. State Farm
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 576 So. 2d 160
Ex Parte Williams
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 576 So. 2d 649
Ex Parte McCracken
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 576 So. 2d 664
Ex Parte Kuenzel
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 577 So. 2d 531
Ex Parte Ala. Inst. for Deaf and Blind
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 578 So. 2d 1308
Kirkland & Co. of Anniston v. a & M FOOD
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 579 So. 2d 1278
Peck v. Dill
Date: January 11, 1991
Citation: 581 So. 2d 800
The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual state court sites. These court opinions may not be the official published versions, and you should check your local court rules before citing to them. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.