Mitchell Marbury v. State of Alabama

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 10/28/2011 Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o formal r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s , Alabama A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1 ((334) 2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may be made b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r . ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2011-2012 CR-10-0997 Mitchell Marbury v. S t a t e o f Alabama Appeal PER from Talladega C i r c u i t (CC-00-583.64) Court CURIAM. AFFIRMED BY U N P U B L I S H E D MEMORANDUM. W e l c h , P . J . , a n d Windom, B u r k e , Kellum, J . , concurs specially, with and J o i n e r , J J . , c o n c u r . opinion. CR-10-0997 KELLUM, J u d g e , I write Mitchell multiple claims court Procup 3 2 , A l a . R. So. P., petition life imprisonment and file v. S t a t e , for postconviction precluded or without Therefore, adopting 7 92 situated (Ala. Crim. sanctions merit F.2d 10 69 2009). 2 like i n which h i s wastes the those (Ala. Crim. inmates. App. relief I would encourage 531 S o . 2 d 323 Strickland, similarly 3 d 119 Crim. of parole. I b e l i e v e that a l l o w i n g Marbury t o resources. of prevent future f r i v o l o u s l i t i g a t i o n other a c t i o n a p p e a r s t o be the petitions v. this without to consider Peoples Rule sentence are either judicial fifth that h i s 2001 c o n v i c t i o n f o r f i r s t - d e g r e e r o b b e r y resulting possibility specially. s p e c i a l l y to note Marbury's challenging his concurring scarce circuit proposed i n App. 1988), and ( 1 1 t h C i r . 1986), to on t h e p a r t See Ex p a r t e o f Marbury and Thompson, 38

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.