Constance F. Russell v. First Resolution Investment Corporation

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

REL: 07/13/2018 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM, 2017-2018 2170251 Constance F. Russell v. First Resolution Corporation. Appeal from Madison Circuit Court (CV-17-48). Investment PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.; Rule 1.16(b), Ala. R. Prof. Cond.; Rule 78, Ala. R. Civ. P.; Johnson v. City of Mobile, 195 So. 3d 903, 921 (Ala. 2015); Jefferson Cty. Comm'n v. Edwards, 32 So. 3d 572, 583 (Ala. 2009); Hale v. Larry Latham Auctioneers, Inc., 607 So. 2d 154, 155 (Ala. 1992); Ex parte Diaz, 224 So. 3d 605, 607 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); Barnes v. Jayne, 679 So. 2d 1141, 1142 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996); and Richardson v. Richardson, 531 So. 2d 1241, 1242 (Ala. Civ. App. 1988). All the judges concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.