Carol Renee Hitt v. Melvin Loy Roden (Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court: DR-03-190.02) Application Granted; Opinion Of December 21, 2012, Withdrawn; Affirmed. No Opinion.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
REL: 03/01/2013
Notice: T h i s o p i n i o n i s s u b j e c t t o f o r m a l r e v i s i o n b e f o r e p u b l i c a t i o n i n t h e advance
s h e e t s o f Southern R e p o r t e r . R e a d e r s a r e r e q u e s t e d t o n o t i f y t h e R e p o r t e r o f D e c i s i o n s ,
A l a b a m a A p p e l l a t e C o u r t s , 300 D e x t e r A v e n u e , M o n t g o m e r y , A l a b a m a 3 6 1 0 4 - 3 7 4 1
((334)
2 2 9 - 0 6 4 9 ) , o f a n y t y p o g r a p h i c a l o r o t h e r e r r o r s , i n o r d e r t h a t c o r r e c t i o n s may b e made
b e f o r e t h e o p i n i o n i s p r i n t e d i n Southern R e p o r t e r .
ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL
APPEALS
OCTOBER TERM, 2012-2013
2110061
C a r o l Renee H i t t
v.
M e l v i n Loy Roden
Appeal from Lawrence C i r c u i t Court
(DR-03-190.02)
On A p p l i c a t i o n f o r R e h e a r i n g
MOORE, J u d g e .
APPLICATION
GRANTED;
WITHDRAWN; AFFIRMED.
OPINION
NO OPINION.
OF
DECEMBER
21, 2012,
2110061
See
Spradlin
Empiregas,
Rule
v.
53(a)(1)
Spradlin,
and
601
(a)(2)(A),
So.
2d
76,
A l a . R.
79
App.
P.;
( A l a . 1992);
and
I n c . o f A r d m o r e v. H a r d y , 487 So. 2d 244, 251 ( A l a .
1985).
P i t t m a n , Thomas, and D o n a l d s o n ,
Thompson,
J J . , concur.
P.J., d i s s e n t s , with w r i t i n g .
2
2110061
THOMPSON, P r e s i d i n g J u d g e , d i s s e n t i n g .
This
things,
i s a postdivorce proceeding
Carol
Renee
Hitt
("the
i n which,
wife")
sought
among
a
other
finding
of
c o n t e m p t a g a i n s t M e l v i n Loy Roden ("the husband") b a s e d on h i s
alleged
failure
to
comply
with
provisions
i n the
parties'
d i v o r c e j u d g m e n t r e g a r d i n g t h e payment o f p e r i o d i c a l i m o n y
alimony i n gross.
and
remand t h i s
I would r e v e r s e the t r i a l
cause to the
j u d g m e n t e x p l a i n i n g how
alimony-in-gross
trial
court
i t determined
s a l e of a p a r c e l of r e a l p r o p e r t y
See
B l a s d e l v.
B l a s d e l , 65
Therefore,
So.
3d
420,
credit
433
a
against i t s
the proceeds
owned b y
I respectfully dissent.
3
c o u r t ' s judgment
f o r i t to enter
a w a r d t o t h e w i f e b a s e d on
the
2010).
a
and
the
of
husband.
(Ala. Civ.
App.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
